Aspirant Bharat Logo
AspirantBharat
The social platform for aspirants by AimIndia.in
Sign In Sign Up
Live Updates
Consulate General of Japan in Kolkata: Official Local Staff Vacancy (Oct 2026 Cadre) (2) - Apply Online • JKSSB Various Departments Recruitment 2026: 518 Posts in Agriculture, Forest, Health & Jal Shakti (Advt. 08/2026) (518) - Apply Online • Andhra Pradesh High Court Civil Judge (Junior Division) Recruitment 2026: State Judicial Service (39) - Apply Online • WBPSC West Bengal Audit and Accounts Service Recruitment Written Examination Result • UPSC Civil Services Examination (CSE) & NDA-II Final Merit List & Cutoff Marks • WBPSC Clerkship Examination (Advt No. 13/2023) Part-I E-Admit Card Released • Central Free Coaching Scheme for SC and OBC Students for Competitive Examinations 2026 (100% Free Coaching for UPSC Civil Services, State PSCs, RRB, SSC, Banking, and CLAT + Monthly Stipend of Rs. 4,000/- to local students and Rs. 6,000/- to outstation students.) • PM Internship Scheme 2024 (Pilot Phase) (₹5,000 Monthly Stipend + ₹6,000 One-time Incidentals Assistance)
Aspirant Bharat Logo
Aspirant Bharat
UPSC Civil Services Hub Cover Image
UPSC Civil Services Hub Profile Picture
Official Study Circle

UPSC Civil Services Hub

25 회원 • Public Circle • Lainnya
Discussions & Feed Members (25)
Meenakshi Sundaram profile picture Meenakshi Sundaram profile picture
Meenakshi Sundaram
17 시간 - 번역하다

Bhai log Mains GS2 me 'Judicial Activism' aur 'Judicial Overreach' me line kahan draw kare answer likhte waqt? Agar court executive policy me intervene kar raha ho to answer me criticism likhna chahiye ya praise?

avatar

Ankita Banerjee

1792173169
Bhai balanced answer likhna sabse zaroori hai. Judicial Activism (jaise Article 21 ko expand karna, Right to Privacy, PILs) positive intervention hai jo citizen rights protect karta hai. Par jab court firecrackers ban ya liquor ban highway pe direct executive order deta hai to wo 'Overreach' me aata hai jahan Separation of Powers (Article 5 violate hota hai. Answer me Doctrine of Separation of Powers zaroor quote karna.
· 0
avatar

Trisha Das

1792173156
Bilkul sahi bola! Supreme Court ke landmark judgements jaise Kesavananda Bharati aur Minerva Mills quote karo. Conclusion me likho ki judiciary should act as a watch-dog, not as a super-legislature.
· 0
avatar

Koyel Biswas

1792173166
Subhash Kashyap sir ki book me ispe bohot clean points diye hue hain, answer me committee recommendations bhi add kar sakte ho.
· 0
Sunil Maurya profile picture Sunil Maurya profile picture
Sunil Maurya
17 시간 - 번역하다

Bhai log Mains GS2 me 'Judicial Activism' aur 'Judicial Overreach' me line kahan draw kare answer likhte waqt? Agar court executive policy me intervene kar raha ho to answer me criticism likhna chahiye ya praise?

avatar

Tarun Bhowmick

1792172623
Bhai balanced answer likhna sabse zaroori hai. Judicial Activism (jaise Article 21 ko expand karna, Right to Privacy, PILs) positive intervention hai jo citizen rights protect karta hai. Par jab court firecrackers ban ya liquor ban highway pe direct executive order deta hai to wo 'Overreach' me aata hai jahan Separation of Powers (Article 5 violate hota hai. Answer me Doctrine of Separation of Powers zaroor quote karna.
· 0
avatar

Vikram Yadav

1792172631
Bilkul sahi bola! Supreme Court ke landmark judgements jaise Kesavananda Bharati aur Minerva Mills quote karo. Conclusion me likho ki judiciary should act as a watch-dog, not as a super-legislature.
· 0
avatar

Indranil Ghosh

1792172633
Subhash Kashyap sir ki book me ispe bohot clean points diye hue hain, answer me committee recommendations bhi add kar sakte ho.
· 0
Deepali Rathore profile picture Deepali Rathore profile picture
Deepali Rathore
18 시간 - 번역하다

Bhai log Mains GS2 me 'Judicial Activism' aur 'Judicial Overreach' me line kahan draw kare answer likhte waqt? Agar court executive policy me intervene kar raha ho to answer me criticism likhna chahiye ya praise?

avatar

Devendra Singh

1792172061
Bhai balanced answer likhna sabse zaroori hai. Judicial Activism (jaise Article 21 ko expand karna, Right to Privacy, PILs) positive intervention hai jo citizen rights protect karta hai. Par jab court firecrackers ban ya liquor ban highway pe direct executive order deta hai to wo 'Overreach' me aata hai jahan Separation of Powers (Article 5 violate hota hai. Answer me Doctrine of Separation of Powers zaroor quote karna.
· 0
avatar

Sharmistha Pramanik

1792172059
Bilkul sahi bola! Supreme Court ke landmark judgements jaise Kesavananda Bharati aur Minerva Mills quote karo. Conclusion me likho ki judiciary should act as a watch-dog, not as a super-legislature.
· 0
avatar

Harsh Tiwari

1792172064
Subhash Kashyap sir ki book me ispe bohot clean points diye hue hain, answer me committee recommendations bhi add kar sakte ho.
· 0
Arpita Sarkar profile picture Arpita Sarkar profile picture
Arpita Sarkar
18 시간 - 번역하다

Bhai log Mains GS2 me 'Judicial Activism' aur 'Judicial Overreach' me line kahan draw kare answer likhte waqt? Agar court executive policy me intervene kar raha ho to answer me criticism likhna chahiye ya praise?

avatar

Sourav Naskar

1792171479
Bhai balanced answer likhna sabse zaroori hai. Judicial Activism (jaise Article 21 ko expand karna, Right to Privacy, PILs) positive intervention hai jo citizen rights protect karta hai. Par jab court firecrackers ban ya liquor ban highway pe direct executive order deta hai to wo 'Overreach' me aata hai jahan Separation of Powers (Article 5 violate hota hai. Answer me Doctrine of Separation of Powers zaroor quote karna.
· 0
avatar

Rathin Ghosh

1792171472
Bilkul sahi bola! Supreme Court ke landmark judgements jaise Kesavananda Bharati aur Minerva Mills quote karo. Conclusion me likho ki judiciary should act as a watch-dog, not as a super-legislature.
· 0
avatar

Riya Sen

1792171480
Subhash Kashyap sir ki book me ispe bohot clean points diye hue hain, answer me committee recommendations bhi add kar sakte ho.
· 0
Nikhil Deshmukh profile picture Nikhil Deshmukh profile picture
Nikhil Deshmukh
18 시간 - 번역하다

Bhai log GS4 Ethics ke case studies me hamesha doubt hota hai. Agar koi practical situation ho jahan law allow nahi kar raha par humanitarian ground pe help karna zaroori hai, to answer me administrative rule follow kare ya human empathy? Model answers me dono likha rehta hai, actual exam me examiner kya expect karta hai?

avatar

Ishita Sen

1792170867
Bhai dono ka balance hi main marks dilwata hai! Pehle strict legal boundary explain karo, fir legal framework ke andar kya discretionary powers hain (jaise emergency discretionary funds, local NGO involvement) wo suggest karo. Rule todne ki baat kabhi mat likhna, par insensitive robot bhi nahi dikhna chahiye.
· 0
avatar

Sunil Maurya

1792170858
Bilkul sahi bola! UPSC yehi test karta hai ki pressure me tum law abide karte hue kitne compassionate ho. Case study me 3-4 options bana ke pros & cons likha karo, 10 marks me se 7+ pakka aayenge.
· 0
avatar

Divya Reddy

1792170854
Bhai Lexicon book ke last me jo solved case studies hain na, unko ek baar dhyan se padh lo. Kaunse keywords (Probity, Integrity, Empathy) use karte hain wahan se idea lag jayega.
· 0
에 대한

Daily answer writing practice, GS mains discussion, editorial breakdowns, ethics case studies, and optional strategy.

© {날짜} {사이트 이름}

Aspirant Bharat is an independent educational platform and is not affiliated with any government agency.

언어
Messages & Circles
Real-time study chats
Full Messenger
No Active Conversations Yet
Start chatting with fellow aspirants in the Aspirants tab or join a Study Circle!